![]() ![]() Choose another writer in this calendar: by name: by birthday from the calendar.
TimeSearch |
|
Sir Isaiah Berlin (1909-1997) |
English social historian, philosopher, essayist, friend of the Russian authors Anna Akhmatova and Boris Pasternak. According to an anecdote, the Cold War began in 1945, when Isaiah Berlin visited Anna Akhmatova in Leningrad – this so irritated Stalin that he personally ran the philosopher down on the telephone. Berlin never wrote a single-volume magnum opus but only brilliant essays. In one of his most famous works, The Hedgehog and The Fox (1953), he drew a distinction between those who relate everything to a single, organizing principle, and those whose lives and ends reflect plurality. "It is seldom, moreover, that there is only one model that determines our thought; men (or cultures) obsessed at their models are rare, and while they may be more coherent at their strongest, they tend to collapse more violently when, in the end, their concepts are blown up by reality - experienced events, 'inner' or 'outer' that get in the way." (from 'Does Political Theory Still Exist?, 1962, in The Proper Studyof Mankind, edited by Henry Hardy and Roger Hausheer, 1998, p. 76) Isaiah Berlin was one of the most formidable defenders of philosophical liberalism and distinguished practitioners of the history of ideas. He took R. G. Collingwood's (1889-1943) idea that the thought of a period or an individual is organized by "constellations of absolute presuppositions." Thus philosophical analysis required a historical dimension, but Berlin argued against the Marxist determinist view of history and rejection of free will. In his youth, Berlin studied Marx, although during World War I
and
the Revolution he had witnessed the ill omens of a totalitarian
ideology struggling for power, and was not enchanted by the promises of
the Bolsheviks. "History does not reveal causes; it presents only a
blank succession of unexplained events," he said in Hedgehog and the Fox. (Publisher: Ivan R. Dee, 1993, p. 15) However, Berlin
acknowledged that a historian's approach to his subject cannot be
entirely objective or value-free, some degree of moral or psychological
evaluation is inevitable. "I do not here wish to say that determinism
is necessarily false, only that we neither speak nor think as if it
could be true, and that it is difficult, and perhaps beyond our normal
powers, to conceive what our picture of the world would be if we
seriously believed it..." (from 'Historical
Inevitability,' 1953, in The Proper Studyof Mankind, edited by Henry Hardy and Roger Hausheer, 1998, p. 147) The Russian Revolution was a horrible
example of the potential destructiveness of ideas. Berlin was born in Riga, Latvia, the son of a Jewish timber merchant. Berlin's grandfather on his mother's side was a Hasidic rabbi. Berlin had some religious education but confessed later that as a child he found the Talmud a ''very, very boring book." At the age of 11 Berlin emigrated with his parents to England. A prodigy, he had already read Tolstoy's War and Peace. At that time he spoke little English but his parents, who felt no nostalgia for Russia, spoke English to each other. Berlin
was educated at St Paul's School and Corpus Christi
College,
Oxford. To his father's disappointment, he did not go into the family
timber business. His
first philosophical mentor was the Kantian, Russia-Jewish Menshevik
émigré Solomon Rachmilevich (1891-1953), a family friend.
"Anglo-American philosophy and Kant formed me," Berlin has said in an
interview. (Isaiah Berlin: a Kantian and Post-idealist Thinker by Robert A. Kocis, 2022, p. 71)
Like most of the liberal-minded undergraduates, Berlin hated Mussolini,
Franco, and Hitler, and all the minor dictators taking power in the
1930s. Some of his Communist friends admired Stalin. From 1932 Berlin taught at Oxford. There he became friends
with A. J. Ayer and other leading analytic philosophers. Berlin was the
first Jew to be accepted into the college. With Ayer he argued about
philosophy. Where Ayer was a radical liberal and had a great
appetite for life, Berlin was sexually insecure and unsure of his
beliefs. "You're not much of a crusader are you?" Ayer once teased his
friend. (A.J. Ayer: A Life by Ben Rogers, 1999, p. 59) With Austin, Ayer, and others Berlin was a founding father of Oxford philosophy, but he was not wholeheartedly committed to the analysis of ordinary language, characteristic at Oxford. Disillusioned with Ayer as a philosopher, he said that "he never had an original idea in his life. He was like a mechanic, he fiddled with things and tried to fix them." (A.J. Ayer: A Life by Ben Rogers, 1999, p. 59) The author Virginia Woolf, who first
met Berlin in 1933, said that he looked like a swarthy Portuguese Jew
and talked with the vivacity and assurance of a young Maynard Keynes.
In 1934 Berlin visited Palestine. Zionism was to him as important as
Communism was to Guy Burgess, his friend, who was a Soviet spy. Like all of his friends, liberal-minded undergraduates, After publishing several papers on the rebellion against
idealism, he broke away from the general spirit of positivism. With his
first book, Karl Marx (1939), Berlin disengaged himself from
the fashionable philosophical trends, and started his lifelong
examination of such thinkers as Vico, Herzen, Herder, Tolstoy,
Machiavelli, and such topics as liberty, determinism, relativism,
historicism, nationalism – and his most distinctive doctrine:
pluralism. He also translated into English several Russian classic
authors, among them Turgenev. During World War II Berlin served in the British Information
Service in New York and later as First Secretary of the British Embassy
in Washington. After the war he met in the Soviet Union the film
director Sergei Eisenstein, who was in poor spirits after Stalin had
condemned his film Ivan the Terrible,
and the writers Boris Pasternak and Anna Akhmatova, both also in
disfavour by the authorities. Later Berlin gave his account of them in
the essay Meetings with Russian Writers in 1945 and 1956 (1980). "When we met in Oxford in 1965 Ahkmatova told me that Stalin had been personally enraged by the fact that she had allowed me to visit her: 'So our nun now receives visits from foreign spies,' he is alleged to have remarked, and followed this with obscenities which she could not at first bring herself to repeat to me." (from 'Conversations with Akhmatova and Pasternak,' in The Proper Study of Mankind, edited by Henry Hardy and Roger Hausheer, 1998, p. 548) From
1947 to 1958 Berlin wrote and lectured at Oxford, in
London,
and in several American universities. Joseph Brodsky, the Russian-born
poet and essayist, once said that Berlin's English was just like his
Russian, only faster, '"courting the speed of light." Rayner. An
extrovert by nature, Berlin has also been characterized as a
"compulsive chatterer." He hated public speaking and the day-to-day
routines of his work, but he loved Oxford and college life. During this
period, Berlin turned his attention to the thinkers of the
Enlightenment. When Berlin visited Russia with his wife in 1956, he met
Boris Pasternak at
his dacha in the village of Peredelkino. Akhmatova declined to meet
him; to her disappointment he had got married "in the most ordinary,
banal fashion." Pasternak gave him the
typescript of his novel Dr Zhivago.
Well aware about the consequences of its appearance in the West, Berlin
first tried to persuade his old friend from "flirting with
martyrdom," but eventually helped him to have the manuscript smuggled
out of the country. Between the years 1957 and 1967 Berlin held the prestigious
Chichele Chair in Social and Political Theory at at All Souls College,
Oxford. In his inaugural lecture at Oxford, Berlin attempted clearly to
distinguish "negative" and "positive" liberty. He contrasted the ideas
of such thinkers as J.S. Mill, Herzen, and others, who made minimal
assumptions about the ultimate nature and needs of the subject, with
Hegel and German Idealism, and their "despotic vision" and dogmatic
assumptions about the essence of the subject. Like Karl Popper, he
became widely acclaimed for his anti-authoritarian social philosophy
and criticism of totalitarian doctrines, but his ideas had a limited
resonance among university philosophers of his time. Berlin's most
important
contributions in social and political theory include the essays Historical
Inevitability (1954) and Two Concepts of Liberty
(1958).
Berlin's
indifference to socio-economic causation, and emphasis on the ideas,
beliefs and intentions of individuals, prompted E.H. Carr to attack on
him in lectures delivered at Cambridge in 1961. "But Sir Isaiah Berlin
is a deservedly popular and widely-read writer. During the past five or
six years, almost everyone in this country or in the United States who
has written an article about history, or even a serious review of a
historical work, has cocked a knowing snook at Hegel and Marx and
determinism, and pointed out the absurdity of failing to recognise the
role of accident in history. It is perhaps unfair to hold Sir Isaiah
responsible for his disciples. Even when he talks nonsense, he earns
our indulgence by talking it in an engaging and attractive way." (What is History?: The George Macaulay Trevelyan Lectures Delivered in the University of Cambridge January-March 1961 by E. H. Carr, 1961, pp. 120-121) While serving as a member of the academic advisory board of
the University of Sussex in the 1960s, Berlin barred the appointment
Isaac Deutscher, a Marxist historian and writer of a three-volume
biography of Leon Trotsky, to a position in Soviet studies at the
university. Berlin suggested that he was not qualified for the job and
considered him worthy only of a Chair in Marxism. Berlin said that
Deutscher was "the only man whose presence in the same academic
community as myself I should find morally intolerable." (Isaiah Berlin and the Enlightenment, edited by Laurence Brockliss and Ritchie Robertson, 2016, p. 223) Among many other academic distinctions, Berlin was from 1966 a professor at the City University of New York. During the period which led up to the foundation of the State of Israel, he was a close friend of Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), the first president of Israel. Berlin led a bachelor's life until 1956, when he married Aline de Gunzbourg at Hampstead Synagogue; she was an aristocratic Frenchwoman, who had three sons from previous marriages. They moved into Headington House, where Berlin lived for the rest of his life. "I don't mind death," he once said, "But I find dying a nuisance. I object to it." Students have told that he conducted tutorials from his bed, "the covers scattered with books, papers, cups of tea and biscuits." (Isaiah Berlin: A Life by Michael Ignatieff, 1998, p. 5) Berlin died in 1997 in Oxford of a heart attack following a long illness at the age of 88. In The Hedgehog and The Fox Berlin focused on the
tension
between monist and pluralist visions of the world and history, and drew
the line between different authors and philosophers. As the Greek poet
Archilochus said: "The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows
one big thing." The Hedgehog needs only one principle, that directs its
life. Typical examples are Plato, Dante, Pascal, Nietzsche and Proust.
The Fox, pluralist, travels many roads, according to the idea that
there can be different, equally valid but mutually incompatible
concepts of how to live. The roads do not have much connection, as is
seen in the works of Aristotle, Montaigne, Shakespeare, Moliére, Goethe
and Balzac. In Tolstoy, whose view of history inspired Berlin to write the essay, he saw a fox who believed in being a hedgehog. Berlin's central dichotomy of monists and pluralists and his interest in such Counter-Enlightenment figures as Vico, was later interpreted as an attack on the values of Enlightenment. He was also accused of ultra-individualism. In his essays on Machiavelli, Montesquieu and Hamann in Against
the Current
(1979), Berlin stated that these thinkers replaced the doctrine
that all reality forms a rational whole with a radical pluralism, from
which sprang such -isms as irrationalism, nationalism, fascism,
populism, existentialism, and, above all, some of the central values of
liberalism. Berlin argued in Four Essays on Liberty (1969) that liberty is in essence the casting off of chains. "Negative liberty" allows men the freedom to act diversely and '"positive liberty" limits some freedoms to achieve a higher good. Berlin once stated: "Total liberty can be dreadful, total equality can be equally frightful." All those doctrines which define liberty as self-realization and then prescribe what this is, end up by defending liberty's opposite. To the perennial human problems there are no final answers. "Everything is what it is: liberty is liberty, not equality or fairness or justice or human happiness or a quiet conscience." (Four Essays on Liberty, p. 125) Liberal governments should recognize that all political values must end up in conflict, and all conflicts require negotiation.
Selected works:
|