  Choose another writer in this calendar: by name: by birthday from the calendar. TimeSearch |
Ivan (Aleksandrovich) Goncharov (1812-1891) | |
|
Russian writer, who is best-known for his humorous novel Oblomov (1859), a leading work in Russian Realism. Oblomov is a young, generous nobleman, who is incapable of action or decision making and rarely leaves his room or his bed. Ivan Goncharov's book was considered a satirical portrait of the Russian aristocracy, who no longer had a useful role in society. Goncharov published only three novels. During the later period of his career, he was criticized as reactionary. "On the other hand, should depression of spirits show itself in his face, his glance would' grow dull, and his brow furrowed, as doubt, despondency, and apprehension fell to contending with one another. Yet this crisis of emotion seldtom crystallized into the form' of a definite idea—still less into that of a fixed resolve. Almost always such emotion evaporated in a sigh, and shaded off into a sort of apathetic lethargy." (from Oblomov, translated by C. J, Hogarth, The Macmillan Company, 1915, p. 9) Ivan Goncharov (also written Gontsharov) was born in Simbirsk (now Ulyanovsk), the son of Alexander Ivanovich, a wealthy grain merchant, and Avdotya Matveevna – Goncharov described her as "an excellent, experienced, and strict housekeeper." (Oblomov and his Creator: Life and Art of Ivan Goncharov by Milton Ehre, Princeton University Press, 1973, p. 7) Simbirsk was a provincial center but looked like a village. Later the poet Lermontov said, that in the sleepy town even the Volga rolled slower and smoother. Goncharov's father died in 1819 and young Ivan was raised by his godfather, Nikolai Tregubov, a liberal-minded aristocrat. He studied at a commercial school (1822-30), and at the University of Moscow. Known for his retiring personality, Goncharov did not join the student circles. After
graduating in 1834, Goncharov served nearly 30 years as
a government official. On the surface his life passed quite
uneventfully, with the exception of his remarkable journey around
the world, which lasted approximately two years and six months. While working at the foreign trade office in St. Petersburg, he met the poet Apollon Maikov and his brother Valerian, who encouraged Goncharov in his writing aspirations. Goncharov's first novel, The Same Old Story (1847), about the clash between the decaying Russian nobility and the new merchant classes, appeared in the highly influential periodical The Contemporary. It had been founded by Pushkin, and after Nikolay Nekrasov, and Ivan Panayev bought the journal, they started to publish in it radical fiction. When censorship started to tighten its grip, the paper was closed in 1866. Goncharov had early learned French, German, and English, and in The Same Old Story he mocked provincialism. Vissarion Belinsky, the most influential critic of the day, hailed Goncharov as a poet-artist, whose "talent is not of the first magnitude, but it is a strong and noble one. A feature of his talent is an extraordinary skill in depicting feminine characters." (Selected Philosophical Works by V.G. Belinsky, Foreign Language Publishing House, 1948, p. 450) The protagonist of the novel, a young idealist named Alexander Aduyev, adopts his uncle's disillusioned view of the world; Pyotr Ivanych Aduyev, a new practical Russian, is a career bureaucrat and also a factory owner. When Alexander argues that reality does not make man happy, he cuts him short: "That's crazy talk! Something you brought with you from somewhere on the border with Asia. In Europe, we've long since ceased to believe in that kind of things. Dreams, fancy ideas, illusions, that's fine for women and children. but a man must face the fcts of life for what they are." (Ibid., translated by Stephen Pearl, Alma Classics, 2015, p. 304) Uncle Pyotr does his best to crush the idealism of his nephew. However, at the end he realizes that he cannot live without the love of his wife and decides to abandon his old ways of thinking and move with her to Italy. This novel was followed in 1848 by Ivan Savvich Podzhabrin, a psychological sketch in the naturalist manner, which Goncharov had written in 1841. Goncharov began his second novel, Oblomov, in the late 1840s, but the work was interrupted. According to Count Uspensky, at that time "one could not move, one could not even dream; it was dangerous to give any sign of thought - of the fact that you were not afraid." (Tolstoy by A. N. Wilson, Penguin Books, 2001, p. 124) Between the years 1852 and 1855 Goncharov made a voyage to England, Africa, Japan, and back to Russia via Siberia as the secretary of Admiral Putyatin. It fulfilled his dream of traveling to distant places. The voyage itself on a three-masted schooner with 485 crew members was not physically exhaustive; it was the Petersburg climate that had had a negative effect on his healt. Goncharov had a lot of free time to write long letters to his friends. After returning to St. Petersburg on February of 1855 from Siberia, Goncharov accepted a position in the censorship - a decision which other writers found difficult to swallow. Though he had been sympathetic to the progressive ideas of Belinsky in his youth, he was basically a "liberal conservative," more interested in people as they are and less trying to change them. In the essay 'A Million Torments' (1872) Goncharov praised Aleksandr Sergeevich Griboedov's comedy Wit Works Woe for its vitality and characters, especially the characterization of Chatsky, while Pushkin's Onegin and Lermontov's Pechorin have become history and grown "petrified in immobility like statues on tombs." (Russian Literary Criticism: A Short History by R. H. Stacy, Syracuse University Press, 1974, p. 4) Noteworthy, Goncharov himself was, in private, a cool and detached observer; Belinsky sometimes attacked him for showing no emotions. Goncharov's The Frigate Pallada (1855-1857) was written in the form of letters. It appeared first in segments in various journals and then in a book form. An immediate bestseller in the Tsarist Russia, the popularity of the work surpassed even that of Oblomov. It was appreciated also in the Soviet era, when against the truth the travelogue was declared anti-colonial in its orientation. "A beguiling impression of excellent literature, humor, and art has remained with me from The Frigate Pallada," wrote Yury Olesha in one of his journal entries. "I'm not even talking about the material of the book itself: the voyage round the world described in it and described so well that you want to call it the best travel book ever written." (No Day Without a Line: From Notebooks, Northwestern University Press, 1998, p. 153) The
purpose of the government expedition, which ended at the mouth of the
Amur River in Siberia, was to establish trade and diplomatic relations
with Japan and observe the Russian colonies in North America, but the
outbreak of the Crimean war made it impossible to travel to the
Unites States. Basically Russia did not want to be left behind in the
imperial race, especially with Britain, in "the Great Game." Like Oblomov, Goncharov himself finds it difficult to
cope with changes and
doesn't want to explore new ports. He also expresses prejudicial views
about other nations. Constantly he points out the discrepance between
expectations and actual experience - the
sea is not poetic but boring and ugly, souveniers in the Cape of Good
Hope are not local products: they have been imported from England.
Because of
the worldwide colonial expansion, the difference between the Europe and
the Orient do not appear to be so profound: "I
expected something more," Goncharov says. While visiting London he went
shopping and bought himself a pair of pistols, a cigarette case, a
dagger, and other useless knick-knacks. (A World of Empires: The
Russian Voyage of the Frigate Pallada by Edyta M. Bojanowska,
2018, p. 7) Oblomov appeared first in the journal Fatherland
Notes in 1859. A section of the book, 'Oblomov's Dream,' was
published separately in 1849. The novel was hailed as a
masterpiece, and among others Fyodor Dostoyevsky
considered Goncharov as a noteworthy rival in literature. Leo Tolstoy
wrote: "I remember how Goncharov, the author, a very sensible and
educated man but a thorough townsman and an aesthete, said to me that,
after Turgenev, there was nothing left to write about in the life of
the lower classes. It was all used up. The life of our wealthy people,
with their amorousness and dissatisfaction with their lives, seemed to
him full of inexhaustible subject-matter." (from 'Preface,' in The Precipice by
Ivan Goncharov, translated from the Russian by M. Bryant, Alfred A. Knopf, MCMXVI, p. v) Contemporary writers saw
the
indecisive Oblomov as a Russian Hamlet, who answered "no" to
the question "to be or not to be." Lenin, who was also born in Simbirsk
and knew well the work, cited it many times as a warning: "The old
Oblomov has remained, and for a long while yet he will have to be
washed, cleaned, shaken, and thrashed if something is to come of him." ('The Twilit Middle Class of Nineteenth-century Russia' by
Sidney Monas, in Between Tsar and
People: Educated Society and the Quest for Public Identity in Late
Imperial Russia, edited by Edith W. Clowes, Samuel D. Kassow,
and James L. West, 1991, p. 58) Goncharov portrayed his famous character sympathetically,
although Oblomov became the personification of the idle nobility or
more widely, the national psyche. Ilya Ilyitch Oblomov spends his time
in bed, comfortably in his dressing gown of Persian cloth - "it was so soft arid pliable that, when wearing it, the body was unaware of its presence, and, like an obedient slave". (Ibid., p. 10) Occasionally he argues wearily
with his morose, drinking manservant, Zakhar, who thinks that fleas,
lices, and other vermin are a natural part of life. Incapable of
occupying himself with practical matters, Oblomov is cheated by his
financial adviser and his country estate slides into ruin. Schtoltz, his
friend, half-German by birth, is a completely different character - determined, learned, successful businessman. Oblomov's great love is Olga, but he puts off weddings too many times and finally loses her to his more pragmatic friend. Eventually Oblomov marries Agafia Matvievna, a widow. They have a son, and when Oblomov dies, Schtoltz adopts him. Oblomov is a daydreamer, he has great visions, but he has lost his ability for doing things - Schtoltz calls him a poet. "You see, Andrei, at no point in my life have I been touched with a fire which could either save me or destroy me. I have lived a life different from' that of others," he confesses to Schtoltz. "No, I began life with a quenching of the light of day, and, from the first moment that I realized myself, realized also that I was on the wane" (Ibid., p. 158) In the novel Oblomov is trying to get out of the bed, but in 50 pages he barely manages to move from bed to a chair. From this figure derives the Russian term oblomovshchina, meaning backwardness, inertia. In modern Western literature, Oblomov is said to have inspired Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot. Goncharov retired from his post as a censor in 1867. His last
novel, The Precipice (1869), which he had begun to write in
1849 while visiting his native Simbirsk, related the rivalry between
three men,
a nihilist, an idealist, and a commonsensicial neighbour, for the love
of a mysterious woman. This massive work failed to gain the popularity
Goncharov
so desired, at the time when it first came out, or later on. "It
displays all his shortcomings: an absence of imagination; an extreme
subjectivity in psychological painting, and the consequent lifelessness
of all the characters that are not founded on introspection; an absence
of poetry and of real inspiration; and an unsurmountable smallness of soul." (A History of Russian Literature from Its
Beginnings to 1900 by Prince D. S. Mirsky, 1958, p. 190) In his teens Goncharov had shown some signs of mental
instability. His tendency to paranoia culminated in the accusation,
that in Dvoryanskoe gnezdo (1859,
Home of the Gentry) Ivan Turgenev had stolen characters and situations from The Precipice. Even Flaubert was
accused of getting the idea for Sentimental
Education from Turgenev, who had heard it from Goncharov. Still
in
1856 Goncharov and Turgenev had sat solemnly together for a photograph,
with a number of other Contemporary contributors,
including
Leo Tolstoy. As a result of their quarrel, Turgenev removed one scene
from his book, which further fuelled Goncharov's paranoia. In addition to three novels, Goncharov wrote short stories, reviews, essays, and a book of memoir, Neobyknovennaia istoriia (1924), in which he once again took up the issue of plagiarism. Goncharov considered Turgenev his only rival after the death of Gogol. He belittled Turgenev's literary achievements and maintained that Turgenev, "the chief of the Westernizers," was his secret enemy. Profoundly disappointed by the reception of The Precipice,
Goncharov
spent the rest of his days travelling
and in lonely and bitter recriminations. "This novel was my life," he
said. "I put in it a part of myself, people close to me, my native
region, Volga, my home, in short, all my personal life. ('The
Precocious Talent of Ivan Goncharov' by Galya Diment, in Goncharov's Oblomov: A Critical Companion,
edited by Galya Diment, 1998, p. 35)
Goncharov never
married. When he was in his sixties, he started a relationship with a
housekeeper, Alexandra Ivanova Treygut, the widow of his manservant
Karl Treigut. Goncharov died of pneumonia in St. Petersburg, on September
15, 1891. He left his estate to Alexandra who was with him at his
death. Goncharov's remains
at Nikolskoe Cemetery of Alexander Nevsky Lavras were moved in 1956 to
the Volkovo Cemetery. In his
lifetime, Goncharov refused to have his novels translated and would
have been upset in the English translation of The Precipice from 1915: the some
twelvehundred pages long novel had been abridged into 319 pages,
"beyond recognition". (Classics in Russia 1700-1855: Between Two
Bronze Horsemen by Marinus Antony Wes, 1939, p. 317) On his writing, Goncharov relied more on inspiration than on reason, like Romantic poets. In the article 'Luchshe pozdno chem nikogda' (1879, Better Late Than Never), Goncharov said that "Initially I write sluggishly, awkwardly, monotonously . . . and I feel bored writing, until suddenly the light pours in and illuminates the ways where I am to go." (Oblomov and his Creator: Life and Art of Ivan Goncharov, p. 83) The purpose of his novels, he explained, was to present the eternal struggle between East and West. For further reading: Goncharov by Janko Lavrin (1954); Goncharov by Janko Lavrin (1969); Ivan Goncharov by Alexandra Lyngstad and Sverre Lyngstad (1971); Ivan Goncharov: His Life and His Works by Vsevolod Setchkarev (1974); Russian Literary Criticism: A Short History by Robert H. Stacy (1974); Oblomov and His Creator: The Life and Art of Ivan Goncharov by Milton Ehre (1974); Ivan Goncharov by Sverre Lyngstad & Alexandra Lyngstad (1984); Oblomov. A Jungian Approach by Natalie Baratoff (1990); Oblomov: A Critical Examination of Goncharov's Novel by Richard Peace (1991); The Autobiographical Novel of Co-Consciousness: Goncharov, Woolf, and Joyce by Galya Diment (1994); Goncharov's Oblomov: A Critical Companion, ed. by Galya Diment (1998); A Nation Astray: Nomadism and National Identity in Russian Literature by Ingrid Kleespies (2012); A World of Empires: The Russian Voyage of the Frigate Pallada by Edyta M. Bojanowska (2018); Goncharov in the Twenty-first Century, edited by Ingrid Kleespies, Lyudmila Parts (2021) Selected works:
|
